overview - large volume attics - soundproofing - fireproofing - home

 

Cellulose vs. Fiberglass

Keeping Warm and Staying Healthy

A Comprehensive look at Fiberglass and Cellulose Insulation 

 

Natural Resources Defense Council

Principal Author and Researcher: Anjanette DeCarlo; Project Design and Direction: Allen Hershkowitz, Ph.D.

INTRODUCTION  
Insulating a home or office is one of the easiest and most cost effective things to do to protect the environment. As we all know, insulation reduces the amount of energy required to heat or cool a space. What is less well known is that there is a variety of different insulating materials with a range of environmental attributes, costs, advantages, and disadvantages.

Just because insulation helps conserve energy does not mean that the product itself is environmentally sound, many other factors must be considered when assessing the product's environmental soundness, including the health risks, energy required to produce the insulation, its flammability and its recycled content. The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) report examines fiberglass and cellulose insulating materials.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS                                                                                   

After careful review of the literature, interviews with insulation industry executives, government officials, academics and scientists as well as site visits to manufacturing facilities associated with the materials studied, the NRDC has concluded the following:

bulletCellulose insulation manufactured from recycled paper is the least polluting and most energy efficient.
bulletCellulose has the highest post-consumer recycled content. The fiberglass industry averages 35% recycled glass, while the cellulose industry averages a minimum of 75% recycled content.
bulletIt takes more than 10 times more energy to produce fiberglass insulation as cellulose insulation.
bulletDue to air circulation and natural convection, the R-value of blown in fiberglass insulation decreases by as much as 50% as the temperature drops from 45 degrees Fahrenheit to 18 degrees Fahrenheit. 
bulletIn contrast to fiberglass, cellulose has a better resistance to air flow and prevents the upward movement of air caused by temperature differences {the R-value of Cellulose actually improves during cold weather}. Heat flow problems associated with fiberglass make cellulose an attractive alternative.
bulletSubstantial and well-documented public health threats are associated with fiberglass. Fiberglass insulation is required to carry a cancer warning label in compliance with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard.
bulletNo adverse health effects from cellulose insulation have been identified.
bulletBoth types of insulation meet the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) fire protection standards.

 

Just because insulation helps conserve energy, 

does not mean that 

the product itself is environmentally sound

Cellulose Insulation is the least polluting and most energy efficient.

 

It takes more than 10 times as much energy to produce fiberglass as it does cellulose.

 

Substantial and well documented public health threats are associated with fiberglass.

Cellulose is non-toxic. Biologically, cellulose is innocuous.

-Dr, Arthur Furst, Toxicologist

This is a summary of an extensive Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) report. The NRDC is a non-profit environmental membership organization with over 300,000 members and contributors in the US.. NRDC scientists and lawyers have been working to protect the world's natural resources and improve the quality of the human environment since 1970. NRDC  has offices in New York City, Washington D.C., San Francisco and Los Angeles California.

overview - large volume attics - soundproofing - fireproofing - home